Science policy and evidence review

Follow science policy. Examine the evidence.

EvolutionNews.net publishes science-policy monitors and evidence dockets. Monitor publications track consequential developments, assess their significance, and identify opportunities for public participation. Evidence dockets examine antievolution and science-denial claims through claim maps, source trails, and citation checks.

Latest monitor publications

Monitor publications

Source-linked briefings on science policy, public decisions, and opportunities to participate.

Federal monitor

Vaccine review, nuclear priorities and water protection

A source-linked briefing examines federal vaccine evidence standards, nuclear deployment alongside renewable incentives, and proposed restrictions on Clean Water Act coverage.

Latest evidence dockets

Evidence dockets

Examine claims by source type and subject. Browse the full docket catalog.

Article source Flagellum Irreducible complexity 10 claims 5 OA citations

TantoMundo: “The bacterial flagellum and the question of what it is to be alive”

A 2026 article docket on bacterial flagellar motors, chemiosmotic energy, intelligent-design claims, and current work on flagellar evolution.

Broadcast interview Vaccines Public health 12 claims

CNN: RFK Jr. on vaccines, COVID, and pandemic preparation

A 2026 interview docket on vaccine-autism claims, measles, pandemic origins, gain-of-function allegations, and gish-gallop rhetoric.

Podcast Michael Behe Irreducible complexity 12 claims

ID the Future: Behe on “Design of Life” and Neo-Darwinism

A 2026 episode docket separating protein-sequence rarity and specified-complexity claims from Behe’s irreducible-complexity and devolution arguments.

Article source Michael Behe Bacterial flagellum 18 claims

Science & Culture: “Mighty Darwin Has Struck Out”

A 2026 anniversary article docket on Darwin's Black Box, irreducible complexity, the 2026 ancestral-flagellum preprint, and the limits of the article's victory inference.

Catalog rule

How new dockets will be organized

Source type

Articles and essays, broadcast interviews, videos, public statements, and legal or historical records.

Claim domain

Topic tags identify the main review area, such as irreducible complexity, vaccines, origins, or public-health misinformation.

Review state

Each card will show whether it is a public summary, needs editor review, or has been formally signed off.

Stable record

Every docket has a stable URL and a machine-readable JSON summary so indexes and future search tools can link to the same record.

Method

From source claim to reviewable record

1. Capture and translate

Preserve source metadata privately, translate only where needed for review, and keep full third-party text out of the public artifact.

2. Extract claims

Separate scientific claims, opposition claims, legal or historical claims, and open questions before drafting commentary.

3. Align with TOA

Map claims to relevant TalkOrigins IndexCC entries, FAQs, articles, and digitized Library sources for editorial review.

4. Verify citations

Use CiteGeist to verify DOI-bearing references, add bibliographic metadata, and locate open-access source links through Unpaywall.

Source base

Primary comparison material

TalkOrigins Archive

IndexCC claims, FAQs, Dover materials, and article responses are used as the main public response anchors.

Library

Books, papers, scanned source files, and extracted concept records remain in the private review layer unless an editor approves a public citation or summary.

Citation services

Crossref and Unpaywall metadata are recorded as aids to source review, not as substitutes for reading the source.